Sunday, December 4, 2011

The constant drip, drip of the media!

It looks as if the media has accomplished what they set out to do in the case of Herman Cain. He has suspended his campaign for the president of the United States of America.


Even Fox News Channel dipped into the gutter to come up with a way to undermine Cain. In keeping with their habit of plastering people’s face on the TV screen without the benefit of a name they label all the accusations and innuendoes as fact. This happened at approximately 1:25 PM Saturday while awaiting Cain’s speech.  Some unnamed female did chimed in shouting alleged, alleged, that is alleged. Regardless, we cannot help but believe it was intentional.
You know, plant the seed!


It looks as if Fox News Channel is just another CNN want-to-be. They have reached out and hired all the scam artist from the other channels, they now air the individuals espousing the very reasons we quit watching those channels some 20 years ago.  Plus they have brought on board all the deceitful and disgusting such as Bob Beckel, Kersten Powers, Allen Comes, etc. These people are like Bill Clinton they will tell a lie when the truth will do just as good.


Then there is Bill O'Reilly who appears to be more interested in playing games and selling books than “looking out for the folks” as he puts it.


The leader of the pack in the middle Georgia area attacks has been the president and publisher of The Telegraph and his staff George McCanless. The staff according to the masthead is executive editor Sherrie Marshall, executive page editor Charles E. Richardson and visiting member Kenny Burgamy.


Burgamy’s transformation has been nothing short of miraculous; we can only assume it is because of the careful coaching of The Telegraph’s executive page editor Charles E. Richardson.


Burgamy’s promo used to be he had rather read the “Wall Street Journal” listen to “Rush Limbaugh” etc. Now it is the “Atlanta Journal-Constitution” and the “New York Times”, quite a difference!


When we look back at the difference in the way The Telegraph handled the Clinton and Cain Story we see why people may think the staff of The Telegraph leans towards bigotry. 


So just to set the record straight we think it was notable back when the story broke about Gennifer Flowers and Bill Clinton, five days later The Telegraph in an editorial issued instructions to the people of middle Georgia. These instructions were: “Let’s be very careful and very specific in judging Gov. Bill Clinton, a leading Democratic presidential candidate in trouble with his past.” 

They went on to explain that “Clinton’s problem is not so much that his marital background includes infidelities…” and assured the people of middle Georgia that “His problems stems from allegations in a sleazy supermarket tabloid that pays big money for its muck.” 

They then reached out to any and every one they thought could help and circled Bill Clinton to defend him. 

In a similar situation with Herman Cain they joined with AP (Associated Press) and immediately went on the attack. The character assassination was aimed directly at Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain. It was relentless, it 
was brutal and to this day they have provided no factual proof of any misconduct, only accusations and innuendos. 

We see very little difference in “a sleazy supermarket tabloid that pays big money for its muck.” And a “sleazy” newspaper that charges “big money for its muck.” 

Reasonable people may conclude it is the same thing. 

Have a nice day. 

No comments:

Post a Comment