For this The Telegraph Editorial Page Editor Charles E.
Richardson tells us: “They were like two-bit whores who bellied up to the
taxpayers’ bar and declared, ‘I need to bring home the bacon. My no vote will
turn into a yes vote once my palms get greasy with pork fat.’”
He tells us that: “The American people should know that our
legislators are motivated by one simple principle.” Then in spite of the fact
that he is seriously offended when anyone talks about what he thinks as we see
in the following video, he crawls into the mind of every individual who holds
elected office as he tells us: “At the forefront of their thinking during
almost every waking hour they are calculating: ‘How Do I get Re-elected?’”
These video clips are from a conversation with Bill Knowles
at wearepolitics.com and
Richardson. It shows two things: (1) How Richardson portrays his self as even
handed, e.g. – Sam Hart and Charlie Bishop: (2) How he gets offended when he
thinks people are looking “in my head”.
If Richardson wants to change those names to Bush and Obama
we will gladly oblige with a documented list. The Editorial Page Editor and The
Telegraph did everything they could to denigrate the Bush administration. They have
done everything they can to cover-up for the deceit, dishonesty and incompetence
of this administration. They have done this while promoting the paper as “middle
Georgia’s Newspaper”.
The Telegraph and Charles E. Richardson was more than glad
to con the people of middle Georgia when the Obama Administration was in the
process of cramming the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA)
down the throat of the people of this great country.
On November 19, 2009 ABC news ran a story titled The
$100 Million Health Care Vote? The story tells us how “Democrat Mary
Landrieu” who had “…been playing hard…” because the bill which: “Senator Harry
Reid, who drafted the bill, cannot pass it without the support of Louisiana’s
Mary Landrieu.”
In her case there was not a word from Richardson and The Telegraph
about: “…two-bit whores who bellied up to the taxpayers’ bar and declared, ‘I
need to bring home the bacon. My no vote will turn into a yes vote once my
palms get greasy with pork fat.”
No sir, there was no palms getting “…greasy with pork fat.” here. At that time The Telegraph in bed with AP (Associated Press) was telling the people of
middle Georgia in an article titled: “$849B
health bill sets up historic debate”: That “After weeks of
secretive drafting; Reid outlined legislation to rank-and-file Democratic senators
at a closed-door meeting.” No sir, no
one was getting “…greasy with pork fat” here.
We then find at Nebraska Compromise
“The Nebraska compromise or Cornhusker Kickback refers to a deal made in December 2009 by United States Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to Nebraska’s Democratic Senator Ben Nelson, allegedly in order to secure his vote as the last Democratic hold-out for the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and provide the Democrats with the required 60 votes needed to overcome a Republican filibuster. Concessions that were said to have been granted included a provision allowing states to restrict funding for abortions under certain circumstances, as well as a provision giving Nebraska 100 percent federal funding of the Medicaid expansion indefinitely into the future.”
If we fast forward to March 08, 2010 we find an AP
article telling us: “Bye bye, Cornhusker Kickback. Hello, special
treatment for Tennessee and North Dakota. Democrats unveiling revisions
Thursday to their health care overhaul bill decided to kill the extra $100
million in Medicaid funds for Nebraska that has become a symbol of backdoor
deal making.” We also find:
“Special
spending for other states”
“Still alive is special spending for Louisiana, Connecticut, Montana and other states that was included in the health care bill that the Senate approved in December. The House may give it final approval this weekend.”
On this day in The Telegraph we find in less than 100 words,
in the Brief section of the paper: “Democrat:
Health bill likely to pass”
Again nothing in The Telegraph about palms “greasy with pork
fat” or “two-bit whores” here.
“If we look in The
Telegraph there is nothing about palms “…greasy with pork fat” here and we do
not find any indication what-so-ever that: “They were like two-bit whores who
bellied up to the taxpayers’ bar and declared, ‘I need to bring home the bacon.”
The only difference as far as we can determine is one vote occurred
in the Bush administration and the other vote in the Obama administration.
If we are asked why, we have to say we do not know – we cannot
look into The Telegraph Editorial Page Editor’s head.
We have to ask why would anyone trust these people?
For this we would guess we will be condemned to hell, we
will have to go straight to hell and we will not be allowed to pass go.
Have a nice day.
No comments:
Post a Comment