Today’s piece is by Lederman and Peoples of AP. It is titled: Obama responds to Romney’s talk about Mideast.
It looks like The Telegraph and AP have decided to drop their
attempt to blame the failure of the Obama Administration’s foreign policy on the
anti-Muslim video even though Obama himself was still parroting this garbage as
late as Thursday night on Univision.
The video uses an interrupter.
Obama blames the firestorm in Libya and the
Middle East on “…the outrage over the video…” which the whole world with the
exception of the Telegraph and AP now know is an out and out lie.
The Telegraph tried their very best they blamed it on the video no less than some 40 times. Three to six times each brief article they ran.
As we can see in the Reuters article: Obama's
foreign policy bright spot now looking dimmer. Obama says:
“Despite simmering global crises, he will skip traditional private meetings with foreign counter parts and squeeze his U.N. visit into just 24 hours so he can jump back on the campaign trail.”But “…Obama will make time in New York on Monday to tape an appearance on the popular TV talk-show ‘The View’….”
We have to ask is this the way a supposed to be world leader
would act? This is something any honest newspaper or wire service would cover.
The Telegraph and AP point to Obama’s appearance on CBS’s “60
Minutes” and points to Romney like it is his fault that Obama prefers the
company of the people on "The View" to meeting with world leaders and making an
attempt to solve the problems of Libya and the Middle East. We wonder if this
is because Obama does not have any idea what to do about the Middle East.
On Obama’s shunning of Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel The
Telegraph and the AP tell us:
“With the final six weeks of a hard-fought election hanging over the U.N. summit, Obama has opted out of face-to-face meetings with any of his counterparts — not just Netanyahu — during his compressed U.N. visit.”Then The Telegraph and the AP go into their “scam mode”. They tell us that:
“Obama pushed back on the notion that he feels pressure from Netanyahu, dismissing as noise the Israeli leader’s calls for the U.S. to lay out a ‘red line’ that Iran’s nuclear program mustn’t cross to avoid American military intervention.”
“‘When it comes to our national security decisions, any pressure that I feel is simply to do what’s right for the American people,’ Obama said. And I am going to block out any noise that’s out there.’”The Telegraph and AP do not seem to think the fact that Obama thinks of “Israel as merely ‘one of our closest allies in the region.’” is important.
Now we look at the “kicker”.
Let each one of us remember that Obama and Ahmadinejad the president of Iran
who has threatened to wipe Israel “off the face of the Earth” was raised in two
very different cultures and speak two very different languages.
What The Telegraph
and AP failed to tell the reader is that in an interview with Ahmadinejad the
Washington Post’s David Ignatius tells us in “An
interview with Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad” that:
“Ahmadinejad in responding to a question from Ignatius saying: ‘Of course they would love to find a way for their own salvation by making a lot of noise and to raise stakes in order to save themselves’”.Can anyone convince us that under the circumstances it is a coincidence that these two very different individuals came up with the very same wording pertaining to our ally Israel?
Other things The
Telegraph and AP did not tell you:
“Obama has used ‘bump in the road’ before, in reference to unemployment, which was the inspiration for one of Romney’s best ads. Obama’s ‘bumps’ seems to be what other people would call ‘failure.’ The ‘bumps’ include four dead Americans and a disastrous loss of intelligence. (The New York Times reports: ‘The attack in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three other Americans has dealt the Central Intelligence Agency a major setback in its intelligence-gathering efforts at a time of increasing instability in the North African nation.’ One official is quoted as saying, ‘It’s a catastrophic intelligence loss. We got our eyes poked out.’) Had Romney said such a preposterous and grossly insensitive thing as Obama did, there would be calls for him to quit the race; alas, when Obama does it’s not even front-page news for most of the mainstream media.”You can read the entire story at: Obama’s ‘60 Minutes’ wipeout. We find out that Obama is lying to the people once again. At ABC’s President Obama Falsely Claims Fast and Furious Program “Begun Under the Previous Administration”.
Of course The
Telegraph would not cover this because as they put it “it is all politics” that
is the gospel according to The Telegraph Editorial Page Editor Charles E.
Richardson.
These two links
clearly demonstrates that Obama is lying or he is grossly incompetent.
What you are getting
from The Telegraph and AP is nothing more than a scam job. We know that The Telegraph is fond of “free lunches” and “will pedal influence for employment.”
We find at New
Media Catches Obama Bribing the Fourth Estate that CBS and the
Washington Post are reaping the benefits of an Obama slush fund and are reluctant
to talk about it. It stands to reason that if The Telegraph and AP were also
enjoying some unknown benefits derived from the Obama Administration they would
not want to talk about it either.
The Telegraph has
already proved they are susceptible to this type conduct. In addition to this
they proved during the “back room” dirty deals which Obama and the Democrats
used to pass the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) they
would not cover such.
These people cannot
be trusted. They have a refutable record which proves it.
We have to remember
these are the same people that Mercer University has invited in to help teach
journalism. In view of what is known we have to ask if Mercer University
President William D. Underwood has ulterior motives for inviting them in. The
information is out there, therefor it is your call.
Have a nice day.
No comments:
Post a Comment