I'm not sure I'm familiar with which controversy you're talking about.
What's up?
-----Original Message-----
From: wetrack@windstream.net
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 3:06 PM
To: Womack, Amy - Macon
Subject: The Feds
Amy Leigh Womack
Your "Fed on call to insure fairness" Tues. November 2nd 2010 was
interesting. I am sure you know there has been some controversy
pertaining to the fairness of the "Feds".
Our question is, were you familiar with that controversy when you wrote the article?
To help clear this up we sent her links to the following stories.
The following stories was in the Washington Post and it is our understanding from the Editorial Page Editor Charles E. Richardson the staff at The Telegraph is allowed to read the Post.
This story is from the Fox News Channel, we do not know if the staff of The Telegraph is allowed to watch this channel or not!
When we did not hear from Womack we drew the conclusion that she ignored the problems at the U.S. Justice Department deliberately and had no intention of addressing the situation.
We find that: “A federal court in Washington DC, held last week that political appointees appointed by President Obama did interfere with the Department of Justice’s prosecution of the New Black Panther Party.”
Contrary to:
“…Assistant Attorney General Perez’s testimony that political leadership was not involved in that decision.” We find that: “… United States District Court Judge Reggie Walton disagreed. Citing a ‘series of emails’ between Obama political appointees and career Justice lawyers, Walton writes:”
“The documents reveal that political appointees within DOJ were conferring about the status and resolution of the New Black Panther Party case in the days preceding the DOJ’s dismissal of claims in that case, which would appear to contradict Assistant Attorney General Perez’s testimony that political leadership was not involved in that decision. Surely the public has an interest in documents that cast doubt on the accuracy of government officials’ representations regarding the possible politicization of agency decision-making.”
Looking at this it is awfully easy to conclude that Assistant Attorney General Perez’s committed an act of perjury.
If you looked Attorney General Eric Holder’s Justice Department, The Telegraph and Womack also extended their protection to the New Black Panthers when they moved into Florida and placed a bounty on George Zimmerman's head.
It seems as if Mercer President William D. Underwood is unconcerned about the integrity problems at The Telegraph as we sent a certified letter to him about this subject on February 26, 2012.
We have to assume that the almighty dollar is more important to him than honesty and integrity, or perhaps it is the policy of Mercer to follow the path of Penn State University when it comes to problems like this.
However, Mercer President Underwood has to realize he has to get the facilities right.
Have a nice day.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment