I'm not sure I'm familiar with which controversy
you're talking about.
What's up?
-----Original Message-----
From: wetrack@windstream.net
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 3:06 PM
To: Womack, Amy - Macon
Subject: The Feds
Amy Leigh Womack
Your "Fed on call to insure fairness" Tues.
November 2nd 2010 was
interesting. I am sure you know there has been some
controversy
pertaining to the fairness of the
"Feds".
Our question is, were you familiar with that
controversy when you wrote the article?
To help clear this up we sent her links to the
following stories.
The following stories was in the Washington Post and
it is our understanding from the Editorial Page Editor Charles E.
Richardson the staff at The
Telegraph is allowed to read the Post.
This story is from the Fox News Channel, we do not know
if the staff of The Telegraph is allowed to watch this channel or not!
When we did not hear from Womack we drew the conclusion
that she ignored the problems at the U.S. Justice Department deliberately and
had no intention of addressing the situation.
We find that: “A
federal court in Washington DC, held last week that political appointees
appointed by President Obama did interfere with the Department of Justice’s
prosecution of the New Black Panther Party.”
Contrary to:
“…Assistant Attorney General Perez’s
testimony that political leadership was not involved in that decision.” We find that: “… United States District
Court Judge Reggie Walton disagreed. Citing a ‘series of emails’ between Obama
political appointees and career Justice lawyers, Walton writes:”
“The documents reveal that political appointees within
DOJ were conferring about the status and resolution of the New Black
Panther Party case in the days preceding the DOJ’s dismissal of claims in
that case, which would appear to contradict Assistant Attorney General
Perez’s testimony that political leadership was not involved in that
decision. Surely the public has an interest in documents that cast doubt on
the accuracy of government officials’ representations regarding the
possible politicization of agency decision-making.”
Looking at this it is awfully easy to conclude that Assistant
Attorney General Perez’s committed an act of perjury.
If you looked Attorney General Eric Holder’s Justice Department,
The Telegraph and Womack also extended their protection to the New Black
Panthers when they moved into Florida and placed a bounty on George Zimmerman's head.
It seems as if Mercer President William D. Underwood is
unconcerned about the integrity problems at The Telegraph as we sent a
certified letter to him about this subject on February 26, 2012.
We have to
assume that the almighty dollar is more important to him than honesty and
integrity, or perhaps it is the policy of Mercer to follow the path of Penn
State University when it comes to problems like this.
However, Mercer President Underwood has to realize he
has to get the facilities right.
Have a nice day.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment