Is not this simple amazing?
In the In Brief
section we find 202 words with no attribution. Here in a supposedly news
article where we are told by The Telegraphs Executive Editor Sherrie Marshall about a
national security matter.
We are told:
“As a security matter, how the Obama administration immediately described the attack has little effect on broader counterterrorism strategies or on the hunt for those responsible for the incident, in which the U.S. ambassador and three other Americans were killed. And Republicans have offered no explanation for why the president would want to conceal the nature of the attack.”
What we are being told is the fact that The Telegraph, Obama
and his administration have repeatedly lied and deceived the people of this
great country about a National Security matter for the last 39 days and it does
not matter.
As for Marshall’s the “…Republicans have offered no
explanation for why the president would want to conceal the nature of the
attack.”
We might point out to her that the Republicans have no
obligation to offer anything about why Obama wants to lie to and deceive the
people.
Perhaps The Telegraph and Marshall can explain why they feel
it is O.K. for Obama and The Telegraph to lie to and mislead the people.
It might be noted that in case of The Telegraph they are charging the people for it.
It might be noted that in case of The Telegraph they are charging the people for it.
We would also like to know why she feels it is alright for
The Telegraph to lie about and cover up what really happened.
The Telegraph and Marshall both are disgusting.
Have a nice day.
No comments:
Post a Comment