Is The Telegraph just a bunch of scam artists?

Are they all receiving favors, i.e., ““lousy lunches”?

Are all their family members entitled to jobs worth “over 70,000 reasons”? (Second paragraph from the bottom) 

Does McClatchy Newspapers know what appears to be going on here?

Does McClatchy Newspapers care or condone such?

Does it extend beyond “lousy lunches’ and over “70, 000 reasons”?

Why was the overnight decision made to end over a decade long relationship by a General Manager who had been in the area for a short time?

Was this a decision urged on Beck Swan by cohorts at The Telegraph?

Was the decision made because of the morning program on Fox 24 WGXA which aired on the morning of March 15, 2012?

Is this all about honesty, honor and integrity or the lack of on The Telegraph’s part?

Did it have anything to do with Tom Wagoner, Bill Knowles,
Sam Hart, Attorney General Eric Holder and the Obama Administration?

Then, why after firing one individual who in a casual remark dared to compare President Obama with Richard Nixon for doing the same thing i.e., protecting things with a declaration of Executive privilege did they bring someone on board who works for FEMA i.e., Federal Government – Obama administration etc. and who keeps their bags packed?

Was these decisions made by the general manager of WGXA TV Channel 24 which is owned by Frontier Broadcast Holdings?

Or was this decision made after close consultation with The Telegraph’s President and Publisher George McCanless, Executive Editor Sherrie Marshall and the Crown Jewel – Editorial Page Editor Charles E. Richardson?

Did these decisions have anything to with protecting such things as a “lousy meal” and possible employment for family members for “over 70,000 reasons”? 


The Editorial Page Editor Charles E. Richardson is the "lousy lunch" and "over 70,000 reasons" guy. 

We know there is a great deal of money floating around out there, does the hiring of an individual with connections to President Obama via FEMA have any bearing on all this?

Is there somehow a connection with these decisions and The Telegraph’s declaration that any vote to cite Attorney General Eric Holder for contempt of congress is “just politics” and their decision to dedicate only 124 words to it.

Does all this have any bearing what-so-ever on The Telegraphs decision to ignore the “Fast and Furious” scandal?

Does any of this have anything to do with the fact that The Telegraph has ignored the death of two federal agents which was connected to “Fast and Furious”?

Why has The Telegraph cut off all communications on matters like this?

Why hasn’t The Telegraph’s President and Publisher George McCanless cleared all this up?

 There are reports that the Washington Post is enjoying benefits handed out by the Obama Administration. Is this perhaps where The Telegraph has cast its’ eye with an out reached hand?

After all, one “lousy lunch” and one job for “over 70,000 reasons will not go very far, will it? Second paragraph from the bottom.

Is all of this what brought on the joy and laughter seen here?

If we can get the answers to these questions, we can say: “I can see clearly now”.

Check back tomorrow for an up date.

The people of middle Georgia need a newspaper, but they need one that will provide honest news they can trust!

Have a nice day.