Friday, August 24, 2012

Mike Stucka and The Telegraph: Facts dumbfound them!

The following is an e-mailed we Mailed to The Telegraph's Mike Stucka on August 16, 2012 after he informs us "...you're building arguments based on things that aren't true."

It seems as if Stucka is familiar with this problem as can be seen in the video's at The Telegraph and Mike Stucka's advise.  From all appearances Stucka is conjuring up comments and attributing them to people who did not make them. You can see the video clips and reach your own conclusion. 

The e-mail begins here: 
This is nothing personal; however we would like to point out a few things.

The Telegraph has pointed out their position on reporting the news to the reader.  In 2009, the reader is told: “The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution states that ‘Congress shall make no law …abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press.’ The constitution does not address, directly or by implication, how to ‘report the news,’ with or without bias.”

It was just a short step from “with or without bias” too “with honesty and integrity or without honesty and integrity.” 

You are intelligent enough to know qualifications have nothing to do with morality and integrity. The Telegraph has a systemic problem with the latter going back for years.

This was pointed out by none other than the late Editorial Page Editor Ron Woodgeard as early as January of 2001.

There is no better example of The Telegraph’s hard core bigotry than the way they handled the story of Bill Clinton and Herman Cain.  The Clinton story can be seen at this link. http://wetrack-wetrack.blogspot.com/2012/08/the-sordid-saga-of-telegraph-and-bill.html  The sordid saga of The Telegraph and Bill Clinton! 

When this is compared with The Telegraph’s participation in the “hi-tech” lynching of the Republican Presidential Candidate Herman Cain, the bigotry is blinding and it can be seen here: http://wetrack-wetrack.blogspot.com/2012/08/the-telegraphs-hi-tech-lynching-of.html  The Telegraph's "hi-tech" lynching of Herman Cain!

As can be seen, The Telegraph tells us that: Clinton’s dishonesty, deceit lying, philander, etc. did not matter: “His problem stems from allegations in a sleazy supermarket tabloid that pays big money for its muck.”

As for the “hi-tech” lynching of Herman Cain from the beginning to the end The Telegraph never published any information about the background of the women making the accusations which may have led people to doubt their creditable. This information was available and to not use it was dishonest and deceitful. Reasonable people could conclude it was deliberate.

Then there is the way The Telegraph has scammed the people of middle Georgia about the criminal enterprise the Obama administration is running out of the U.S. Justice Department. We are talking about the gunrunning, the death of government agents, etc. Then there is Eric Holder the first black Attorney General who was cited for “Contempt of Congress” and the First black President who has declared “Executive Privilege” to cover for him; and we are told by The Telegraph that this is not news. 

These video clips were added after sending this e-mail to Stucka.



The Telegraph has ignored the White House dumping top secret information and putting our troops in danger and selling out our friends the Israelis.

The Telegraph’s policy pertaining to this administration seems to be do not use anything that we cannot use for Black History month.
The reason for this given by The Telegraph is it is all politics; this is a joke and not even a serious joke, but typical Telegraph.

It was not that way with the first Hispanic Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales, according to The Telegraph that was all news and no politics.

What about Romney’s tax returns, this is a different standard than the one used for, the known traitor John Kerry and it never applied to Ted Kennedy or John Edwards.

We might note that according to the President and Publisher George McCanless his standard for reporting ethical problems for Democrats is they have to be tried and convicted. He explained this in an e-mail about Rep. Rangel (D-NY) and then to drive the point home he tells us: “…I trust you get the message.” 

More recently we note the scam on the front page of The Telegraph, August 13, about a $2.7 trillion surplus in the Social Security funds which is another joke.

Then this latest scam where The Telegraph peddles influence for employment and tries to cover-up it up is not going to go away.
By November most people will recognize The Telegraph for what it is.
The list is endless. The people at The Telegraph can deny it, they can lie about it or they can ignore it. The one thing they cannot do is change it. 


“News stories are indeed based on facts, and should not have an opinion. If you see a news story with opinion, by all means, please point it out to an editor with a telephone call or a letter to the editor. In the absence of actual examples -- facts that support your argument -- I can't really say anything else but in the abstract.”

The following comments were added to the above story on August 24, 2012.

Perhaps Stucka would reply to our e-mail and list the things that aren't true. He has like the others at The Telegraph when presented with facts made the decision to ignore them. The Telegraph is a joke!

Have a nice day. 

No comments:

Post a Comment