The Telegraph chose an article titled Campaigns
trade accusations of lies by Jim Puzzanghera for their foray into providing deception to the people of middle Georgia. We can see everyone got their talking points and have crawled
down in the gutter with Obama as they try to paint Romney as dishonest.
They passed up an AP article titled Presidential
race rumbles into final 4 weeks with the basics difference being
the AP article mentions how Obama is “weak” and how his administration keeps “…changing
explanation for the deadly attacks on the U.S. consulate in Libya.”
The Telegraph was still running this scam long after the
rest of the world had figured out what was going on.
Perhaps there was a free
lunch or lunches and future
employment involved for someone at The Telegraph. They have proved beyond
a shadow of a doubt they are susceptible to this type of conduct.
The Telegraph has done everything they can to help with the
Obama administrations cover up of this sordid affair.
It reminds people that
Obama has no foreign policy and how his incompetence has led to the death of
our Ambassador, two former Navy Seals and a computer tech. It demonstrates he
is more than willing to deceive the people of this Great Nation for his own political
purposes.
The Telegraph’s President and Publisher, George McCanless,
Executive Editor, Sherrie Marshall and Editorial Page Editor Charles E.
Richardson have clearly demonstrated they are willing to cover up the deceit and
dishonest of the Obama Administration.
For The Telegraph to promote the paper as “middle Georgia’s
newspaper” while carrying the water and striving to help this administration
with their deceit and dishonesty is the perfect definition of a “scam”.
If they
want to be the propaganda arm of the Obama Administration let them be honest
about it
If we are wrong we are more than willing to listen to anyone’s
explanation of how and why.
The Obama administration has been as dishonest as any administration since the Nixon years.
The Telegraph has been more than
willing to deceive the people of middle Georgia about this administration. As we have noted before they have reached the
point when they cannot cover up or twist things for Obama they just declare it “all
politics” and not worth covering.
This is not unlike the way they scammed the people during
the Clinton Administration. When Clinton’s problems first appeared they rushed
to join the media circle around him and offer their protection. Nothing demonstrates this more than the following.
On Tuesday, Jan. 28, 1992 in an editorial titled “Can one
sleazy story destroy Clinton Candidacy?"
The Telegraph issued instructions to the people of middle Georgia on how
they should react to the Clinton scandals. The instructions were: “Let’s be
very careful and very specific in judging Gov. Bill Clinton, a leading
Democratic presidential candidate in trouble with his past.”
The Telegraph then went on to assure everyone that Clinton
was not responsible for his troubles. They assured us “His problems stems from
allegations in a sleazy supermarket tabloid that pays big money for its muck.”
Till this day they carry the water for the Clintons, one of
which is involved in the Obama Administration's cover up of the problems
in the North Africa and the Middle East.
As late as 2003 The Telegraph was lying to the people of
middle Georgia as they told, them all Clinton did was lie “…about having an
illicit sexual affair with a woman…” of course they did not mention she was a
young intern at the White House.
So it comes as no surprise when The Telegraph and the Obama
administration undertake to drag honest people down to their level in the
gutter.
If you noticed in the article “Campaigns Trade Accusations
of lies” used by The Telegraph today there is absolutely nothing useful in the article which might
help the reader with the upcoming election.
In the second paragraph they tell us that Romney accused
Obama of “not telling the truth about Romney’s tax plan.” They also insinuate
that Romney will raise taxes on the middle class. As late as the 7th
Obama in an e-mail was telling people that:
"In fact, Harvard economist Martin Feldstein and Princeton economist Harvey Rosen both concede that paying for Romney’s tax cuts would require large tax increases on families making between $100,000 and $200,000."
But the two economists responded with:
“But that's not true. Princeton professor Harvey Rosen tells THE WEEKLY STANDARD in an email that the Obama campaign is misrepresenting his paper on Romney's tax plan”.
You can see the
article in this link. Princeton
Economist: Obama Campaign Is Misrepresenting My Study on Romney's Tax Plan
You might want to look at this link also. Princeton
Economist: Obama Campaign Is Misrepresenting My Study on Romney's Tax Plan
They worked Gingrich
in with a reminder that he said during the primary that “Romney was running a ‘fundamentally
dishonest campaign’”.
Again they tell the
reader that:
“…Obama aides and supporters pressed their assertions that Romney’s tax plan doesn’t add up and that he misled voters during the debate.”
Then Axelrod asserts
that lying is what Romney “used to do in private business…” and Axelrod goes on
to tell us that “…Romney was ‘dishonest in his answers….’”
If you noticed the
deceit and dishonest was pointed at Romney while Obama was given a pass. This was the purpose of the article.
This is disgusting
and dishonest. The Telegraph has chosen deceit and dishonesty over the truth.
We have to reach the conclusion they did this on purpose and for the reason of misleading the people of middle Georgia.
Have a nice day.
No comments:
Post a Comment