The Telegraph has resorted to what they label as analysis this way they have a free hand with their deception. Thus when they tell the reader that Romney has “…erased the specter of doom that has dogged his campaign for weeks” they can call it opinion.
They tell us how “Obama also can take solace in history…” Well if we are looking at things that way we
find that there is no historical record of any black president ever being
elected to a second term! Nor is there any historical record of any black
president declaring Executive Privledge to protect his Justice Department which
is being run by the first black Attorney General (Eric Holder) which was held
in contempt of Congress. We see this at: Obama
claims executive privilege; Holder held in contempt. This The
Telegraph just declared was not news worthy because it was all politics and
therefor they would not cover it.
Yesterday The Telegraph resorted to one of McClatchy
Newspapers articles which for the most part provided no useful
information of course this was the intent. They try to convince the reader with Obama’s “‘We’ve begun to fight
our way back,’ Obama said, arguing that he has helped turn around the economy
but needs four more years to finish the job. ‘We’ve still got a lot of
work to do.’”
The Telegraph covers up an enormous Romney win with their Candidates
clash over economy. They made the choice to ignore such as: Romney barrels
out of first debate on offense. Here Obama tell us: “…his own choices were ‘benefiting
middle-class families all across the country.’" But no one explains
how a “drop of $3,040 per household” benefits anyone. If Obama is the one
telling the lie that is O.K.
The AP analysis came to close to the truth and could not be tolerated
by The Telegraph. Perhaps that is why the Executive Editor Sherrie Marshall chose
the McClatchy version.
“Republican Mitt Romney was fiery and having fun. President Barack Obama came off as the professor without much pop.”
“And while Democrats grudgingly conceded that Romney did well in Wednesday's debate, what matters is whether he changed the dynamic of a race that he appeared to be losing.”
That is available here. Analysis: Romney
the challenger, indeed
AP also had a “fact check” which has been ignored. We have
to be carefully here because there is no one checking the “fact checker” and
some of these individuals were the same people who joined The Telegraph in The
Telegraph's "hi-tech" lynching of Herman Cain!
But then they continue to ignore pertinent facts. Such as:
For the first two years the
Democrat Party and Obama had a majority in both the House and Senate. He did
what he wanted to do, i.e. He passed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care
Act which a large majority of the Nation disapproved of. He chose to ignore jobs
and the economy which would have been of benefit to the entire nation. He used
this majority and back door deals which cost the taxpayers hundreds of millions
of dollars.
The fact that:
“Using constant 2012 dollars (to adjust for inflation), the median annual income of American households was $53,718 as of June 2009, the last month of the recession. Now, after 38 months of this “recovery,” it has fallen to $50,678 — a drop of $3,040 per household.”
The entire article can be seen here. Americans’ Incomes Have Fallen $3,040 During the Obama ‘Recovery’
It is comical when Obama tells us "If
you want to be president, you owe the American people the truth," Obama
said at a campaign rally Thursday in Denver. Apparently it is alright for him
to be dishonest.
Perhaps The Telegraph ignored this
because of the deceit and dishonesty of Obama and his administration has used
in the cover up of the attack on the consulate in Benghazi. After all to cover
this up they touted the deceit and dishonesty just as it came from the White
House when most of the rest of the world was trying to get the truth out. It
looks as if The Telegraph has decided the best way to cover it up is to declare
it all politics and ignore it as they did with the criminal acts of Attorney
General Eric Holder and “Executive Privledge.”
These are the type of things The Telegraph has ignored because
as The Telegraph Executive Editor Sherrie Marshall says it will “…give voters
pause”.
To help cover up Obama’s dismal performance on the Editorial
or Opinion page the Editorial Page Editor Charles E. Richardson uses what he
calls “…members of our Citizens Editorial Board” whatever that is.
Maybe they are a replacement for Visiting Member Kenny
Burgamy who at one time graced the masthead of The Telegraph. From all appearances
he got
the boot soon after Editorial Page Editor Charles E. Richardson got
caught ignoring the “McClatchy
Code of Business Conduct and Business Ethics which all “…employees
have to sign.”
General Manager Beck Swan said she could not discuss it as
it was a personal matter. At a later date discussing a others which left under
similar circumstance Richardson makes the remarks that when this happens you
know they are booted.
Whatever Richardson let everyone know how pleased he was when Burgamy was forced out in
one heck of a belly roll of a laugh.
In Richardson’s defense the President and Publisher George
McCanless wrote his “In
the pocket?” It seems as if McCanless was 100 percent right when he
says: “To think you could ever have Charles in your pocket, much less for the
price of a lousy lunch ….”
It was shortly after this that Bill Knowles on his web site
wearepolitics.com exposed the fact that the Editorial Page Editor Charles E.
Richardson had been pedaling influence for the Bibb County Board of Education
and their Superintendent, Dr. Dallemand and was rewarded with employment for
his wife to the tune of “some
70,000 reasons”. That is quite a hefty sum in this economy and in this
part of the country. Burgamy came awful
close to exposing this on the air and some people reached the conclusion that
is the reason for the job change.
Anyway back to the “Citizen Editorial Board” as we
understand it these people whatever they are serve at the pleasure of The
Telegraph and Richardson. Therefor what is associated with their name can be
controlled and we just explained what happened to Kenny Burgamy. You can see
what was said at: “Impressions
from Wednesday’s first presidential debate”
Other things The Telegraph does not want you to know are. In
an article by CNN Political Unit we are told:
"According to a CNN/ORC
International survey conducted right after the debate, 67% of debate
watchers questioned said that the Republican nominee won the face off with one
in four saying that President Barack Obama was victorious."
In an article by CBS: Poll Mitt Romney wins first
presidential debate we are told:
“…the winner of the first
presidential debate between President Obama and Mitt Romney. 46% thought Governor
Romney won the debate and 22 % thought Mr. Obama did."
The Telegraph cannot be trusted. Their cover up and
misleading information about the coming election is nothing but a disgrace and
it will come back to “haunt” them.
Have a nice day.
No comments:
Post a Comment