The Telegraph: Anything for a scam.

If the McClatchy owned newspaper, The Telegraph, can find something deceitful and/or dishonest or something they can change and make that way they will print it. The disgusting thing about all this is Mercer University President William D. Underwood brought these people in to teach this to the future journalism students.

On November 23, 2012 the flim-flam artist at The Telegraph found an editorial from the Los Angeles Times titled “Fog of politics on Benghazi”. 

One would suppose at a quick glance the professional con-artist at The Telegraph grasped the fact that this piece would be useful in two ways.

They could change the heading to Republicans, not White House, muddle Benghazi ‘talking points’ and use it to slam the Republicans. They could then use the article to aid in their cover-up of the lies and deceit of the Obama Administration without assuming the responsibility for the piece. This is often a tactic used, something like a false flag.

It would seem that the Los Angeles Times like The Telegraph does not mind a little dishonesty and deception to further their agenda.

They point out that Rice insisted she was using:  “the best assessment we have today” is that the attack in Benghazi began as a spontaneous response to earlier protests at the U.S. Embassy in Cairo related to the video ‘Innocence of Muslims.’”

This is 78 days after the attack and both the Los Angeles Times and The Telegraph has had access to all the material the rest of the media has had. They know this is dishonest and deceptive or at least all reasonable people would recognize it as such. 

They conveniently omit all material that does not support their agenda. To show that they are nothing more than brazen liars, they tell us that: “Most of the obfuscation has come from Republicans.”

To justify their assertions they tell us that Rice tracked the “‘talking points’ that were assembled by intelligence officials and only slightly edited by the White House and State Department.” The scam-artist goes on to tell us that: 

“The talking points said that there were indications that ‘extremists participated in the violent demonstration,’ which ‘evolved into a direct assault.’ But they didn't indicate that officials had begun to suspect that groups affiliated with or modeled on al-Qaida were involved.’”

As far back as September 28^th McClatchy Newspapers was telling us that:

“The unusual statement from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence appeared to have two goals: updating the public on the latest findings of the investigation into the assault, and shielding the White House from a political backlash over its original accounts.”

We know from CBS News that: 

“…former CIA Director General David Petraeus told members of Congress that his original talking points cleared for public dissemination included the likely involvement by terrorists and an al-Qaeda affiliate. Petraeus said somebody removed the references before they were used to inform the public.”

Of course:

“The Obama administration has declined to directly answer who made the edits. And the nation's top intelligence officials appear either confused or not forthcoming about the journey their own intelligence took.”

From the information available it has become clear that Susan Rice is nothing more than the Obama Administration’s Collin Powell. There is no excuse for what either one did.

There is a CBS article titled Who changed the Benghazi talking points? which sheds some light on this situation.

We have to remember when dealing with the Washington Post and CBS they are on the take from the Obama Administration as noted in  Washington Post and CBS receiving money from Obamacare ‘slush fund’.

In the first paragraph of the article we are told that:

"Two mainstream news organizations are receiving hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars from Obamacare’s Early Retiree Reinsurance Program (ERRP) — a $5 billion grant program that’s doling out cash to companies, states and labor unions in what the Obama administration considers an effort to pay for health insurance for early retirees. The Washington Post Company raked in $573,217 in taxpayer subsidies and CBS Corporation secured $722,388 worth of Americans’ money."

As for The Telegraph and the Los Angeles Times we can say they remind us of “a thief in the night”, both seem to make their living by dishonesty and deception.

Have a nice day.