The Telegraph’s Cover up of Obama Press Conference.

Isn't this just beautiful The Telegraph has shut down everything that will remind people of their irresponsibility, dishonesty and deceit over the past four years. That is understandable when you repeatedly scam people it is not wise to keep rubbing it in there face.

We are talking about the lies, deceit and dishonesty of the Obama Administration.

We realize that this is hard for some of the staff at The Telegraph especially the Editorial Page Editor. This is the individual which pedaled influence for taxpayer’s dollars, “over 70,000 reasons”.

Of course he would not have gotten away with this without the help and cover up of the President and Publisher George McCanless and other enablers at The Telegraph.

The Telegraph ignored the scam the media billed as a press conference yesterday (November 14, 2012). In The Telegraph print addition there was no mention of it at all.

This is understandable when Obama stands in front of the whole world and tells how he sent his U.N. Ambassador out there to lie to the American People. 

There can be no doubt that Obama fully intended to deceive the people of this Great Nation. There has not been a more despicable and dishonest Administration since Richard Milhous Nixon.

Of course when this scam started The Telegraph jumped on board the 13^th day of September. From that time until it became obvious that they were making a fool of their self they repeated the Obama talking points some 45 to 50 times in The Telegraph print addition alone.

Of course Obama's U.N. Ambassador made the rounds on the Sunday talk shows repeating the lie over and over and over. For this Obama tells us what an exemplary job she did.

When a letter writer called this to The Telegraph's attention, the flim-flam specialist of the letters to the editor page tells him that: 

“Since the attack on the U.S. Consulate in Libya on Sept. 11, The Telegraph has published more than 25 stories regarding the issue either in print or on our website.”

Of course this is an out an out misrepresentation of what The Telegraph did. What they did was join others in the media pushing the “big lie” that the Obama Administration was perpetrating on the people of this Great Nation.

When this was questioned at the farce which was being represented as a press conference and Obama swelled up like a school yard bully and threatened anyone including elected representatives of the people most found this hard to take. It would surely have reminded a reader of how The Telegraph has helped set this up.

Reasonable people can reach the conclusion that The Telegraph has reached the point they cannot be honest about what is going on in Washington without calling attention to their deception of the last four years.

 The following is an example of why we feel they could not cover the press conference.

This is a disgrace, watch how Obama swells up, if this is not typical of a grade school – school yard bully, then we have to ask what is?This also brings out how Obama toured the world bowing, genuflecting and what people have described as apologizing to everyone but our allies. Of course The Telegraph did not cover this.

It seems as if there is a great similarity in the way Obama swells up like a school yard bully and the class act of The Telegraph’s Editorial Page Editor Charles E. Richardson. Richardson is the one on your right in the following video clips.

We can see the performance of the Editorial Page Editor again. 

As can be seen in the video The Telegraph's approach is much different for people they do not endorse, for example during the last administration The Telegraph tells us that: 

“However, it sort of makes the lawmakers who changed their votes look a little slimy, because everyone knows why they did it. They were like two-bit whores who bellied up to the taxpayers’ bar and declared, ‘I need to bring home the bacon. My no vote will turn into a yes vote once my palms get greasy with pork fat.’”

Of course when we look back we can see how this did not apply to Bill Clinton. You can see how The Telegraph joined the others in the media to provide protection for this sexual predator at The sordid saga of The Telegraph and Bill Clinton!

The Telegraph went as far as to tell the people of middle Georgia how they should handle the situation and provided an excuse shifting the blame away from Clinton to a "sleazy upmarket tabloid that pays money for its muck."

The Telegraph never did explain the difference between a "sleazy supermarket tabloid that pays big money for its muck." and a sleazy newspaper which charges "big money for its muck". 

Have a nice day.