The Telegraph & AP join together for another flim-flam.

It looks like the AP and The [Macon] Telegraph have come together again for another grand con. We would assume in this case the con-artists are AP’s Kimberly Dozier and The Telegraph’s Executive Editor Sherrie Marshall.

Again in their bigotry and desire to cover for the incompetent, dishonest scam artist in Congress and the Obama Administration, the con this time is on the blood lust, Obama’s personal “kill list” and his move towards one party rule.

There has been a lot of controversy about the Obama Administration which claims to be the sole authority to decide whose life to take. There is no distinction between United States Citizens and others. When and where to take a life is to be the sole discretion of Obama. There is to be no oversight, as the Obama Administration has demonstrated in the past, he is above the Constitutions and the Courts.

Obama is now in the process of surrounding himself with sycophants who will aid him without question. In the case of Lt.(j.g.) John Kerry who has demonstrated his willingness to turn his back on and sell out the people he served with as well as his country, he is now on record as being willing to help Obama ignore the Constitution and bypass Congress.

By the way this is with the approval of the Senate including Georgia’s two so-called Senators, Saxby Chambliss and Johnny Isakson,  they both proudly voted to confirm Kerry, after all Kerry is a remember of that exclusive club the U.S. Senate and that has to come before the welfare of the country.

The reason we credit AP’s Dozier and The Telegraph’s Marshall with this con is because Dozier wrote the article which was a total of 1,399 words then Marshall and her sycophants trimmed it to a total of 201 words for print.

You can be assured Sherrie Marshall and crowd did not trim the article to cover up Dozier’s flim-flam in the fourteenth paragraph.

Dozier tells us that:

 “Drone strikes have expanded dramatically in the Obama administration. Fewer than 50 took place during the Bush administration, while more than 360 strikes have been launched under Obama, according to the website The Long War Journal, which tracks the operations. The strikes have been credited with killing more than 70 senior al-Qaida and Taliban commanders in Pakistan alone since they began in 2004.”

We do not know where Dozier got his numbers, a quick check of the web site “The Long War Journal” provides proof of his misrepresentation – or as The Telegraph would say his lies.

The chart at the web site http://www.longwarjournal.org/pakistan-strikes.php does not distinguish between “senior al-Qaida and Taliban Commanders” The chart titled “ Civilian v. Taliban/al-Qaida Deaths in US Airstrikes in Pakistan – 2004 – 2013” tells us that “Since 2006, there have been 2,492 leaders and operatives from Taliban, Al Qaeda, and allied extremist groups killed and 153 civilians killed, Data for 2004 and 2005 are not available at this time.”

If the two con-artist had been interested in providing honest news they could have pointed the reader to the 182 page report titled “Living Under Drones”, dated September 2012 by “International Human Rights and Conflict resolution Clinic” – Sanford Law School & “Global Justice Clinic” – NYU School of Law. The report tells us how Obama’s “Drones hover twenty-four hours a day over communities….” and “Their presence terrorizes men, women, and children, giving rise to anxiety and psychological trauma among civilian communities.”

They could have also pointed to The Bureau of Investigative Journalism web site where we find that there have been a “Total reported killed: 2,640-3,474" by Obama and his drones.

The site also tells us about “Obama terror drones” and how “CIA tactics in Pakistan include targeting rescuers and funerals” and how “A bureau [of Investigative Journalism] investigation examines terror tactics used by CIA drones in Pakistan”  

We realize these numbers vary. These web sites point out actual documented figures are hard to prove and the Obama administration is more interested in deceiving the public than being honest.

Of course this is nothing new it is just something these two con-artists are not willing to point out. After all you cannot con people by telling them the truth.

Have a nice day. 

The Telegraph's cover-up as Obama plays God!

We are all familiar with The Telegraph’s cover up of the criminal acts of Attorney General Eric Holder and the United States Justice Department and Obama’s declaration of “Executive Privilege” to cover up the crimes.

Well it looks as if The Telegraph is now engaged in a cover-up of this administration’s move towards “one party rule”. The Telegraph has made a concerted effort to conceal this administration’s assertion that they are above the law.

The Telegraph ignored the fact that Obama trashed the bankruptcy laws in the Chrysler and G.M. bail out. They have turned their heads as he chose to ignore the ruling of the courts and now that he has laid claim to the right to kill the citizens of this once Great Nation based on a whim they have passed it off with 254 words in the In Brief section of the paper.

We have noted in the past that this administration is moving more and more towards the path of Zimbabwe’s Robert Mugabe.

In Richard Bourn’s book “Catastrophe – What went wrong in Zimbabwe?” we find that:

 “No one in 1980 could have guessed that Zimbabwe would become a failed state on such a monumental and tragic scale. In this incisive and revealing book, Richard Bourne shows how a country that had every prospect of success when it achieved independence became a brutal police state less than thirty years later, plagued by hyperinflation and collapsing life expectancy and abandoned by a third of its citizens.”

It looks as if in lieu of using a force such as “the Fifth Brigade” used by Mugabe,  Obama’s chose of force is to be the drones.  

From what we have learned the fifth brigade was answerable to only Mugabe, the “kill list” for the drones is administered by Obama as the sole authority. 

To date Obama has ordered the murder of three United States Citizens while reaching out to help protect traitors such as Maj. Nidal Hasan who is facing 13 counts of premeditated murder. To Obama this was “work place violence” He just could not bring his self to admit it was treason and an act of terror, otherwise known as terrorism .

All of this has created some confusion among Obama’s appointees. FBI Director Robert Mueller is not sure about the policy. “Mueller said that he simply did not know whether he could order such an assassination.”  He is also not sure if “…the same criteria used to kill Americans abroad also would apply in the United States and whether the President retained the ‘historical’ right to order such assassination on U.S. Land”

Mueller informs a congressional hearing that asked about this that “…I’m going to defer that to others in the Department of Justice.”

If you recall this is the same Justice Department that was overseeing the selling of guns to the Mexican Drug Cartels which were connected to the death of Federal Agents and thousands of Mexican Nationals

Some of the ATF agents with money problems were also selling guns to the Drug Cartels. See Pistol purchased by ATF agent found at alleged cartel crime scene in Mexico

These are the same people, or criminals, if you will Obama is attempting to cover for with his “Executive Privilege”.

In the case of Attorney General Eric Holder’s defense of Obama’s claims to have the right to kill U.S. Citizens at will; 

“Jonathan Turley a law professor at George Washington University, wrote in Foreign Policy magazine on Wednesday that Holder's remarks not only would be seen by the framers of the Constitution as ‘the very definition of authoritarian power….’”

You can see the memo that all this is supposed to be based on at: “Department of Justice White Paper”

Of course “Baghdad Bob” Carney assures us that;

 “The operations are ‘fully consistent with our Constitution,’ he said.” and “[The strikes] are legal, they are ethical and they are wise.”

Also see: Mueller: I Can’t Say Whether I Now Can Kill Citizens In The United States Under Obama’s Kill Doctrine

This is what the bigots at The Telegraph do not want you to know.

Have a nice day. 

The Telegraph and History

When The [Macon] Telegraph endorsed Obama they give no valid reasons for the endorsement. Judging from the endorsement their primary reason was the fact that he is black.

The first paragraph of the endorsement informs us that; 

"When historians explore the 2008 presidential election at some future time after the glow of the moment has worn dim, they will find several history-making moments." 

What they do not tell you is that those "...history-making moments." will not be found in The [Macon] Telegraph which has went out of their way to mislead and deceive the people of middle Georgia about the Obama Administration.

Historical acts; when the first time Black Attorney General and first time Black President is cast off by the The [Macon] Telegraph and we are told "its not news" and it is "all politics" as can be seen in the following video clips something is badly wrong. This is the gospel according to the Editorial Page Editor Charles E. Richardson of  The [Macon] Telegraph. 

We are talking about "Contempt of Congress" by the first Black Attorney General and a declaration of "Executive Privilege" by the first Black president to cover up the crimes of the United States Justice Department. 

What is so amazing about this the United States Supreme Court has ruled that "Executive Privilege" can not be used to cover up crimes by the Executive Branch of Government. "In US v Nixon (1974), the court ruled that claims f executive privilege on consultations with the President could not survive the need to investigate crimes...." 

See Why Obama's Claim of Executive Privilege Won't Hold by Edward Morrissey of The Fiscal Times.

We are talking about the death of Federal Agents and the death of thousands of Mexican Nationals, including women and children connected to the guns sold to the Mexican Drug cartels under the supervision of the Justice Department. 

The following is a minute insight into the way history can be twisted by historians.  As we look at day to day developments we see the media today doing the same thing. Journalistic integrity, honesty and morality in the media are a thing of the past.

Even more disgusting is the fact that academia has joined in the fiasco. Right here in middle Georgia we can point to Mercer University President William Underwood and his willingness to bring in The [Macon] Telegraph to teach the students journalism. It is reasonable for people to conclude that honor, honest, and integrity just does not matter to these people. As a result the truth is buried by the media and the con-artists prevail with their flim-flam.

The [Macon] Telegraph is at the top of this list and Underwood knows it.

The following was first posted on Tuesday, October 4, 2011

More Roosevelt History!

We have to wonder if Franklin D. Roosevelt was so bad why he constantly rates in the top tier of presidents.

Burton W. Folsom, Jr. in his book, “New Deal or Raw Deal?” points out some interesting facts starting on page 7. Mr. Folsom cites the “adulation” of Henry Steele Commager and Richard B. Morris, two of the most distinguished American historians of the twentieth century. It is pointed out that Commager “…wrote over forty books and became perhaps the bestselling historian of the century. From the first year of Roosevelt’s presidency, Commager lectured and wrote articles in defense of the New Deal.”

Furthermore “Richard Morris, his junior partner at Columbia, was a prolific author and president of the American Historical Association." 

Mr. Folsom points out their “…assessment of Roosevelt and the New Deal: The Character of the Republican ascendancy of the twenties had been pervasively negative; the character of the New Deal was overwhelmingly positive.”

It is noted that:

“Commager and Morris’s assessment highlights four main points of defense for Roosevelt and the New Deal that have been adopted by most historians for the last seventy years: first, the 1920s were an economic disaster; second, the New Deal programs were a corrective to the 1920s, and a step in the right direction; third, Roosevelt (and the New Deal) were very popular; and forth, Roosevelt was a good administrator and moral leader.”

 The story goes on about how:

“These four points constitute what many historians call ‘the Roosevelt legend.’” Also it is important to note that: “…the works of Arthur M. Shlesinger, Jr., and William Leuchtenburg have been essential in shaping and fleshing out this view of Roosevelt….”

Schlesinger won “…the Pulitzer Prize and was probably the best-known historian in America.” And “his three volumes on the rise of Roosevelt and the early New Deal became landmark books.”

In addition to this “Leuchtenburg, a professor at Columbia University and the University of North Carolina, wrote the standard one-volume history of the New Deal. Leuchtenburg studied and wrote his Ph.D. dissertation under the direction of Commager.”

It does not end here, we find that “No one has ever, and maybe will ever, train more New Deal historians than William Leuchtenburg.” 

We are told: “These four parts of the Roosevelt legend have a strong cumulative effect and historians regularly place Roosevelt among the top three presidents in U.S. history.”

Mr. Folsom notes that 

“The four points of defense are currently intact, and are usually found in most histories of the New Deal and in virtually all of the American history textbooks today.”

As we continue, it is noted that Kennedy 

“…cites Leuchtenburg, Schlesinger and four other similar historians and writes, ‘Though I sometimes disagree with their emphases and evaluations, they laid the foundation on which all subsequent study of that period has built, including my own.’”  And it is pointed out that: “Thus, the Roosevelt legend seems to be intact.”

Now let us take a look at what the world-renowned Jim Powell has to say in his book “FDR’s Folly”. Up front in the introduction page [xv] we find that Powell draws:

 “…on major findings by economists about the actual effects of the New Deal – how it promoted cartels, imposed confiscatory taxes, made it harder for companies to raise capital, made it more expensive for companies to employ people, bombarded companies with dubious antitrust lawsuits, and relentlessly denounced employers and investors, prolonging high unemployment. Published during the last four decades, whose findings have been virtually ignored by pro-New Deal political historians like James MacGregor Burns, Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr. Frank Freidel, William Leuctenburg and Kenneth S. Davis. In his autobiography, Schlesinger acknowledged that he ‘was not much interested in economics.’”

Now if we jump to “The great Depression – America, 1929 – 1941” by Robert S. McElvaine who “…is Elizabeth Chisholm Professor of Arts and Letters at Millsaps College in Jackson, Mississippi.…”

We noted in the introduction of this book, reasons to “tread with care” and McElvaine seem to confirm this reasoning when he tells us that “Any work of History is a matter of selection.”  He could have added opinion too!

We then find where McElvaine tells us “The more apparent one is that counter-cyclical policies that were begun in the New Deal as a means of trying to combat the Great Depression worked largely as they were intended to.”

This is contrary to historical evidence. We then find what we feel are nothing more than plain damn bigotry. He continually takes swipes at Ronald Reagan and the Republicans and perhaps there would be nothing wrong with that but we find that in a lot of instances there is not any historical evidence to support what he advocates.

McElvaine puts forth: 

“Oddly, although Ronald Reagan is usually taken to have been far more ideologically committed than FDR was, Roosevelt worried more about the ill effects of continued deficits and tried repeatedly to cut back on speeding. Reagan paid lip service to spending cuts, but he proved far more willing to accept massive deficits (and their short-run economic benefits to the country and political benefits to him and his party) than FDR ever had been during peacetime.”

Historical records prove Roosevelt only became concerned with deficit spending when he felt it would affect his chances for reelection. As for McElvaine’s jab at Reagan, the Reagan administration’s economy is a matter of public record.

There is much more information on how Roosevelt’s legacy was shaped and it is not a pretty picture.

With the cards stacked like this Hugo Chávez could come out in the top tier.

We would like to hear your comments or e-mail us at wetrack@windstream.net.

Have a nice day. 

The Telegraph's cover-up of Senator Menendez and underage prostitutes.

The Telegraph is at it again. We all remember The Telegraph's "hi-tech" lynching of Herman Cain! and all because of unsubstantiated accusation by a group of women The Telegraph would not name. Nor did The Telegraph ever publish information which would have discredited the accusers.

Then there was the Telegraphs all out efforts to protect Clinton who can claim the following titles: he was an impeached president: sexual predator: accused rapist: known liar: perjurer: thief (White House furniture): all around con-artist and disbarred lawyer. The State of Arkansas disbarred Clinton and he resigned to prevent the United States Supreme Court from disbarring him. A lower form of life has never set in the Oval Office until now. You can see The Telegraph’s efforts to cover for Clinton at: The sordid saga of The Telegraph and Bill Clinton!

The Telegraph has just scammed the people of middle Georgia about the Hagel Nomination for Secretary of Defense  They did not see fit to inform us that Hagel does not have a clue as to what is going on in the world. Even the White House admits this.

We are told by the New York Times that “…a member of Mr. Obama’s own team of advisers…” characterizes Hagel’s testimony as “…somewhere between baffling and incomprehensible….”    

 Now The Telegraph’s daily task is to make sure that the information on Democratic Senator Mendez (D-NJ) does not make it way on to the pages of The [Macon]Telegraph.

There is much more evidence of Democratic Senator Menendez’s preference for sex parties with prostitutes than there was to substantiate the accusations against the Republican Presidential Candidate Herman Cain. Even CNN reported on this, see their Mystery source, high stakes as Menendez denies prostitutes allegations.

The fact that the prostitutes are under age according to Emails show FBI investigating Sen. Bob Menendez for sleeping with underage Dominican prostitutes will surely insure it never sees print on The Pages of The Telegraph.

But then this is what one would expect from a so-called news organization that will not cover such historical events as the First Black Attorney General's “Contempt of Congress” and the First Black President’s declaration of “Executive Privilege” to cover up the crimes of his Justice Department and First Black Attorney General.

Even when the crimes involve the sale of guns to the Mexican Drug Cartels: the death of Federal Agents and thousands of Mexican Nationals including women and children all related to the guns.

The [Macon] Telegraph declares it “all politics” and refuses to cover it. What a scam.

Have a nice day. 

The Telegraph uses Yarbrough

On January 15, 2013 The Telegraph ran a column by Dick Yarbrough under the title Local newspapers provide information that empowers. We never really paid much attention to what Yarbrough writes. We have offered wondered why

Yarbrough and Erickson, if they are sincere, would ignore what goes on at The Telegraph. Unlike other columnist found in The Telegraph both are what you may call locals and have to be familiar with The Telegraph and what goes on in the middle Georgia area.

As for Yarbrough’s column reasonable people may conclude that he is one of most uninformed individuals in the State of Georgia or he has a lot in common with the con-artist at The Telegraph.

You can read his column found at the above link and see the following which is why we feel as we do and make up your own mind.

We mailed Yarbrough a hard copy of the following by certified mail, to date there have been no comments from him.

Dick Yarbrough                                                                         January 29, 2013

P.O. Box 725373

Atlanta, GA. 31139

We were dumbfounded by your blanket accolades of local newspapers and newspaper publishers. To quote someone we once read this “has to be dumber than a yard rake.”

The [Macon] Telegraph ran the article under the heading “Local newspaper provide information that empowers”. They did not say who it empowers. Your column may look innocuous and we are sure it was meant that way. However in at least one case it is grossly misleading.  

We are going to provide some factual indisputable evidence with print from the pages of The [Macon] Telegraph and video clips from The Telegraph Morning news program News Talk Central. The program is no longer on the air and the video clips may give a hint of why.

This is one of the local newspapers you speak so highly of and we have to wonder just how proud “your momma and daddy” would be to find out you are hanging around people like this.

·        The Telegraph editorial page editor on Oct. 5, 2008 labeled some “lawmakers”, The Telegraph happened to disagree with, as “slimy” and “two-bit whores". I bet momma would be real proud of that. This can be seen at: “Courageous cowards” at http://digital.olivesoftware.com/Default/Scripting/ArticleWin.asp?From=Archive&Source=Page&Skin=MaconTelegraphA&BaseHref=MTG/2008/10/05&PageLabelPrint=10A&EntityId=Ar01000&ViewMode=GIF

·        The Telegraph frequently labels people who disagree with them as liars. And if you disagree with The Telegraph as can be seen in the video at this link you are told as this individual was: “The caller can go to hell, straight to hell do not pass go.” What about his credibility? – or – http://wetrack-wetrack.blogspot.com/2011/10/what-about-his-credibility.html.

·        The above link also provides the attitude take by The Telegraph Editorial Page Editor Charles E. Richardson when someone brings up his lack of “military service”. But then he considers the “military service” of anybody else fair game.

·        When The Telegraph gets things wrong and people call in you can see the reception they get in the first two videos of this link: The Telegraph and Mike Stucka's advice.  or  http://wetrack-wetrack.blogspot.com/2012/08/the-telegraph-and-mike-stuckas-advice.html

·        The third video clip at this link indicates how the “locals” address the individuals who disagree with them.

·        The forth video shows how the demeanor of The Telegraph’s Editorial Page Editor Charles improves after Kenny Burgamy was given the door and no one is pointing at The Telegraph’s "influence pedaling" and by inference Richardson penchant for “free lunches”.

·        Reasonable people can also come to the conclusion that The Telegraph was pedaling influence for the local officials as can be seen in the first two videos of the above link. In this case it is about the Chairman of Bibb County Board of Commissioners as can be seen in The Telegraph article at: Hart faces conflict of interest claim. Or http://digital.olivesoftware.com/Default/Scripting/ArticleWin.asp?From=Archive&Source=Page&Skin=MaconTelegraphA&BaseHref=MTG%2F2012%2F03%2F15&ViewMode=HTML&PageLabelPrint=1A&EntityId=Ar00102

·        As for the “locals” acknowledging things when there is a disagreement as can be seen by the picture (in the above link) The Telegraph staff in any case where they do not want to address a problem or want to cover it up. They just ignore it, even certified mail.

·        One of the most disgusting things The Telegraph has done was join the “big boys” and use their material for: “The Telegraph's "high-tech" lynching of Herman Cain!” or  http://wetrack-wetrack.blogspot.com/2012/08/the-telegraphs-hi-tech-lynching-of.html  The Telegraph edited out all of the

unfavorable information on the women to make their accusations of “sexual harassment” more creditable.  What was known but not used by The Telegraph is all found in the above link. The Telegraph was never honest with the people about these charges and to this day has not properly informed the people.  

Now we find there have not been one word, not one peep about Senator Mendez and his penchant for “underage prostitutes” from this “local”. Nor his preference for interns who are “…registered sex offenders”. The following links show exactly what we are talking about and there is more evidence on this than all the “big boys” and “locals” put together had on the accusations of sexual harassment on Herman Cain. 

AP EXCLUSIVE: US ORDERED DELAY IN INTERN'S ARREST or http://bigstory.ap.org/article/ap-exclusive-us-ordered-delay-interns-arrest

AP: US ordered delay in Menendez intern's arrest or http://www.northjersey.com/news/AP_Exclusive_US_ordered_delay_in_Menendez_interns_arrest.html

FBI mum on allegations Sen. Menendez 'received the services of young prostitutes' in Dominican Republic or http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/01/25/fbi-mum-on-claim-sen-menendez-saw-prostitutes-in-dominican-republic/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

Any news on this would violate the policy set by President and Publisher George McCanless in an e-mail to us on July 23, 2010 2:21 PM in a response to an inquiry about other Democrats who were having ethical problems.

McCanless informed us that they had not “…been convicted of anything---yet. Then to insure we understood he emphasised “…I trust you get the message.” 

·        During the last administration when the media bared their fangs and sharpened their claws and set their sights on Attorney General Alberto Gonzales The Telegraph made sure they did not miss a thing, they were after anybody and everybody in that administration.

·        The Telegraph is “up to their neck” in what has to be one of the most corrupt educational systems in the State of Georgia. The Telegraph has never come clean about their editorial page editor’s trip to Communist China; the Chinese teachers from China: Dr. Dallemand (County School Supt. for Bibb County.) and the Bibb County Board of Education. They were instrumental in bringing this about. This is back in the news again and it looks as if Dallemand is trying to slither away with a hefty potion of the taxpayers’ money and it looks as if the “local” will slither out of their part in all this and be free to repeat it again. This can be seen at: Dallemand seeks buyout or http://digital.olivesoftware.com/Olive/ODE/TheTelegraph/LandingPage/LandingPage.aspx?href=TVRHLzIwMTMvMDEvMjQ.&pageno=MQ..&entity=QXIwMDEwMw..&view=ZW50aXR5

·        We are all well aware of the way the Chinese do business. They made sure the Clinton Administration was awash in Communist Chinese Money. Of course for the money the Clinton Administration was providing them with technology which we see in the upgrade and expansion of the Communist Chinese military to this day. The high speed computers and upgrades sold to them by the Clinton Administration as revealed in the “Cox report” are being used in their cyber-attacks on the United States today. For anyone who doubts this, Bill Gertz has written three books on the subject and he provides irrefutable documentation and evidence.

·        Betrayal-How the Clinton Undermined American Security (Copyright 1999) – The China Threat-How the People’s Republic Targets America – (2000) – Treachery-How America’s Friends and Foes Are Secretly Arming our Enemies (2004) – By Bill Gertz

·        Another excellent book on the subject is Year of the Rat-how Bill Clinton Compromised U.S. Security for Chinese Cash – (1998) – By Edward Timperlake and William C. Triplett II  

The sources for this material are undisputable. It might be noted that when we returned to the middle Georgia after leaving the Navy we spent many hours in the Bibb County public library going back to the early 90’s and at that time overwhelmed with disgust we quit. So much for your “locals”.

We think nothing shows The Telegraph’s penchant for misleading the public more than the way they handled the Clinton Presidency. Particularly galling was their editorial on January 28^th 1992; five days after the Gennifer Flowers story broke.

The telegraph instructs the people on how they should handle the situation; their instructions are “Let’s be very careful and very specific in judging Gov. Bill Clinton, a leading Democratic presidential candidate in trouble with his past.” They went on to absolve him of all responsibility by telling the public that; “His problem stems from allegations in a sleazy supermarket tabloid that pays big money for its muck.”

The entire time line can be seen at: The sordid saga of The Telegraph and Bill Clinton! or http://wetrack-wetrack.blogspot.com/2012/08/the-sordid-saga-of-telegraph-and-bill.html

This is the same “local” that in future years would do the “high-tech” lynching of Republican Candidate Herman Cain with relish.  We now know about The Telegraph’s penchant for “lousy lunches” on the taxpayer’s dime and what appears to be their willingness to pedal influence for employment. The “lousy lunch” is a fact. We might note that there is a lot more circumstantial evidence of the Telegraph pedaling influence for employment than there was for Republican Presidential Candidate Herman Cain’s charges of sexual harassment. We have it on video; the video presented here is just a small portion of their conduct.

·        The late Phil Dodson, former Editorial Page Editor of The Telegraph was telling people as late as August 2003 that all Clinton did was he “…lied about having an illicit sexual affair with a woman (other allegations of wrongdoing proved to be unsupportable after a lengthy and hugely expensive investigation by Special Prosecutor Kenneth Starr)."

This is also the individual which in a phone conversation about a letter we wrote told us that “Nobody could tell him anything he did not know about the Clinton impeachment.” When asked about David P. Schippers, Dodson snapped “never heard of him”. This was amazing; David P. Schippers was the “Chief Investigative Counsel” for the Clinton Impeachment.

·        If it had not been for Kenny Burgamy, a local pundit and Bill Knowles of wearepolitics.coma lot of this would have never been exposed. If this is not the primary reason it surely is one of the reasons president and publisher George McCanless got rid of Burgamy. The article at this link is misleading, this departure was not amicable, it was a cover up: “Kenny B. leaving WGXA for WMAZ” or http://digital.olivesoftware.com/OLIVE/ODE/THETELEGRAPH/LandingPage/LandingPage.aspx?href=TVRHLzIwMTIvMDYvMjA.&pageno=MTE.&entity=QXIwMTEwNA..&view=ZW50aXR5

As seen in a previous video link Burgamy’s departure was awfully funny to The Telegraph Editorial Page Editor Charles E. Richardson.

·        When the Editorial Page Editor Charles E. Richardson got caught dining off the taxpayer’s dime. courtesy of the Bibb County School Superintendent, the president and publisher George McCanless wrote a column making excuses for him. This pathetic display can be seen at this link. “lousy lunches”  or  http://digital.olivesoftware.com/OLIVE/ODE/THETELEGRAPH/LandingPage/LandingPage.aspx?href=TVRHLzIwMTIvMDMvMDQ.&pageno=MzU.&entity=QXIwMzUwMA..&view=ZW50aXR5

McCanless points out Richardson knew what he was doing was wrong. He then tells us that: “To think you could ever have Charles in your pocket, much less for the price of a lousy lunch, is ludicrous….” On that point he was absolutely right a short time later it was Bill Knowles of wearepolitics.com which exposed the fact that The Telegraph Editorial Page Editor’s wife was working for the Bibb County School Superintendent for over $70,000 a year. This can be seen at: http://www.wearepolitics.com/1/post/2012/04/what-the-bibb-boe-isnt-telling-you.html.

McCanless after telling the reader that: “As I always counsel anyone who asks, when you have a situation that could be a news story, the worst thing you can do is try to avoid it.” Yet this is exactly what McCanless and The Telegraph did in this case. To this day The Telegraph has not cleared the air on this and that is one reason the people of middle Georgia have no faith in anything they write on the school system and other things.

No one not even McClatchy seems to care about what appears to be hard core corruption at The Telegraph. McClatchy was notified as can be seen at: We Are Politics Exposes The Telegraph Once Again! or http://wetrack-wetrack.blogspot.com/2012/07/we-are-politics-exposes-telegraph-once.html

Information at this link also connects The Telegraph Executive Editor Sherrie Marshall to what appears to be the corruption of The Telegraph’s relationship with the Bibb County Board of Education and Dr. Dallemand. So we have all three individuals that were listed on The Telegraph masthead at that time implicated.

Burgamy kept referencing Bill Knowles’ web site. This focused people’s attention on things which was going on at the board of education which The Telegraph had ignored.

Right or wrong – we are not making that judgement but Richardson was making a somewhat suspicious and forceful defense of Dr. Dallemand, a man with a documented questionable background. A simple Google search sheds light on the facts.  
  

As can be seen at this link not everyone fell for what The Telegraph was pedaling: The Telegraph and the “Greased Pig Clip” or http://wetrack-wetrack.blogspot.com/2012/08/the-telegraph-and-greased-pig-clip.html

Last but not the least is The Telegraph’s cover up of the gunrunning out of the United States Justice Department. We are talking about guns which they are now trying to ban telling the average citizens they cannot have them but which they sold thousands to the Mexican Drug Cartels. These guns were linked to the death of three Federal Agents and the deaths of hundreds of Mexican Nationals including women and children. It resulted in a “Contempt of Congress” decision for Attorney General Eric Holder and then Obama declared “Executive Privilege” to protect the people who committed the crimes.

This has to be another first. We have an Attorney General and a so-called Constitutional lawyer who happens to be President of the United States who does not know “Executive Privilege” cannot be used to cover up crimes by the Government.

This “local” (The Telegraph) declared this “all politics” and told the whole world for this reason they would not cover these crimes. The Telegraph wanted nothing to do with anything that would implicate Holder and Obama as the cons they are. This as the Obama Administration decided they would start their gun control program and as Senator Feinstein says “Mr. and Mrs America… turn em all in” The Telegraph has not missed a beat as they carry the water for this administration. Feinstein can be seen at: Video: Dianne Feinstein Says Her Goal is to Disarm All Americans or http://www.infowars.com/video-dianne-feinstein-says-prepare-to-turn-in-your-guns/

Then there is Governor Cuomo’s slip as to his desire for total gun confiscation in the New York Times at: “Cuomo Says He’ll Outline Gun Proposal Next Month” or http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/21/nyregion/cuomo-says-he-will-outline-gun-measures-next-month.html?_r=0

To see this flim-flam by this “local” go too: The Telegraph and the “Greased Pig Clip” or http://wetrack-wetrack.blogspot.com/2012/08/the-telegraph-and-greased-pig-clip.html.   

No doubt there is self-interest but that does not excuse the misleading of the people. We can only assume that you are misinformed, at least where The Telegraph is concerned. 

We do not know if The Telegraph is a member of the Georgia Press Association or not and we are not paying $30.00 to find out. That is sort of immaterial anyway, it is the same profession and if the Georgia Press Association does not speak out against this type of conduct in their profession they are no better than the people committing the offences.

We can say the same for columns like yours which seem to pass off this kind of conduct. At the very least that gives the impression of hypocrisy. 

If you feel that we are wrong we would be glad to consider anything you have to say. If we had an honest “local” newspaper in middle Georgia you would not be reading this.

As things stand reasonable people could easily reach the conclusion that this “local”, The Telegraph, makes a living by deceiving the reader. 

Have a nice day. 

Another con by The Telegraph and AP

The Telegraph has joined with the AP again today in order to con the people of middle Georgia on the economy. They are trying to sell the idea that even though the Democrats are a majority in the United States Government it is the Republicans who are to blame.

They use a total of 1138 words to con the reader. 

The title of the article in print is “Economy unexpectedly shrinks in 4^th quarter”, in the online version the title is “US economy shifted into reverse in late 2012”.  Both are from AP’s Christopher S. Rugaber the AP economics writer and the old boy is known for the way he twist things otherwise his work would not be on the pages of The Telegraph on online at www.macon.com

What they are doing is laying the ground work to blame the “Sequestration” which is due to kick in on March 1 of this year on the Republicans. The idea for this gross blunder originated in the White House and someway or somehow the blame for this has to be shifted to the Republicans. You have to remember you cannot con the people by telling them the truth.

They tell the reader that “economists” say the cause “could prove temporary and the likelihood of another recession appears remote.”  You notice Rugaber does not know enough about his subject to name the “economists” or perhaps he does not want anyone checking his sources or he could just be making the entire thing up.

Rugaber says the Federal Reserve attributes all this to the fact that the “…economy appears to have ‘paused in recent months’… because of temporary factors.” They have named as one of the causes “spending cuts”. Now as noted the “sequestration” kicks in March 1^st and we all know that is not going to be temporary.  Something smells to “high-heaven” here.

But to help ease the shock of all this he points out that; “The Fed reaffirmed its commitment to stimulating the economy by keeping borrowing costs low for the foreseeable future.” What you are not told is that the Federal Reserve is printing “$85 billion” a month and pumping it into the economy. You can see that at; Fed keeps stimulus in place as U.S. economy "paused".  

Sooner or later this is going to catch up with us, you cannot just keep printing money in order to sustain things, it will not work.

 Another thing not pointed out is the tax increase on all working people; we are talking about the “expiration of a Social Security tax cut”. We can assure you that this is not temporary.

This has all the looks of another con by the AP and The Telegraph on the magnitude of The Telegraph's "hi-tech" lynching of Herman Cain!

You can see both. The print version is at: Economy unexpectedly shrinks in 4th quarter and the online version at: US economy shifted into reverse in late 2012.

If this is not the height of deceit and dishonesty we have to ask what is. If you think we are wrong please point out to us where.

Have a nice day.  

Letter to Senator Isakson, Ga.'s Jr. Senator

This was intended for Senator Isakson of Georgia. We found his constituents are limited to a “Message length restricted to 500 characters” and as this does not meet that criterion so we will post it on line.

It does not matter which “Club” John Kerry belongs to he still committed “treason” and according to the interview Senator Isakson seems to approve of this type of conduct. We detected no visible concerns for the State of Georgia and this once Great Nation, just a desire to do what he thought was right by a member of the “Club”. After all is seems as if they think this is one of their perks and they are entitled to it.

 Therefore we suppose he will extend the same courtesy to Senator Bob Menendez (D-NJ) and his penchant for sex with “underage prostitutes” which for other people would probably be characterized as acts of pedophilia. But then Senator Isakson seems to feel that all members of this “Club”, once known as the United States Senate, are entitled to this protection. There is more on the Menendez conduct at the following links:

 Emails show FBI investigating Sen. Bob Menendez for sleeping with underage Dominican prostitutes.

FBI mum on allegations Sen. Menendez 'received the services of young prostitutes' in Dominican Republic

Why So Few Consequences in Robert Menendez and Mike Crapo Senate Scandals?

The following was intended for Georgia’s Jr. Senator, Senator Isakson.

We caught you on Fox News Channel back on 12/21/12. We were quite disappointed.

You mentioned John Kerry’s qualifications and how:

 “Every club has an initiation process and we have our approval hearings and advise and consent in the Senate. So I am sure there will be questions and analyst of his career but I think he will be confirmed.”

First things first, questions about the “qualifications” for Kerry extend way beyond his experience with the foreign relations committee and a “…comprehensive peace agreement in the Sudan which was successfully completed last year.”

According to the so-called historian, Douglas Brinkley, Kerry began his treasonous activity in “October 1969”. At that time Lt. (j.g.) John Kerry was still on active duty in the United States Navy and subject to the UCMJ (Uniform Code of Military Justice). He was stationed in Brooklyn, New York at the Military Sea Transportation Service Command U.S. Atlantic Fleet as an aide to Rear Admiral Walter F. Schlech Jr.

In fact Brinkley tells us: “He was still enlisted, wearing a naval uniform, and working in Brooklyn at the behest of Admiral Schlech.”

There are irrefutable facts that Lt. (j.g.) John Kerry committed treason. His treasonous and dishonest testimony before the U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations on Thursday, April 22, 1971 is indisputable; hundreds of millions of people saw it around the world. They saw it again when he ran for president in 2004. If he was under oath he also committed perjury.

We also know that “As recorded by Roman historian Sallust, Cicero on the floor of the Roman Senate warned about 'treason'” when he said:

"A nation can survive its fools and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and he carries his banners openly against the city. But the traitor moves among those within the gates freely, his sly whispers rustling through all alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears no traitor; he speaks in the accents familiar to his victim, and he wears their face and their garments and he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation; he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of a city; he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to be feared. The traitor is the plague."

It is a fact that his military records show he spent a combined 12 years in the active duty navy and reserves on what was by law a six-year obligation. This smacks of a legal hold for his treasonous activities. No matter what Kerry says he did not release all of his service record and anyone who says he did is either ignorant of the fact or lying.

As for your reference to the “Club” it was our impression that the United States Senate was a part of the legislative body of the United States Government and the people elected were the representatives of the people which elected them as well as their state and this once Great Nation.

It is obvious and indisputable that the elected representatives which have been there a reasonable length of time leave reasonable people with the impression that they are incompetent and incapable otherwise we would not have this massive debt. It is evident the United States Senate have cast aside all statutory laws pertaining to the annual budget effectively placing the Senate above the law. We can see no reason why this is not a violation of their “Oath of office”. 

Now we are watching as the threat to hollow out the Armed Forces and put our nation at risk approaches. John Kerry already has the blood of the United States Military on his hands. If the United States Senate allows this to happen reasonable people may well conclude they will be no better than John Kerry.

We watch this happen as the peoples elected representatives enjoy the perks and benefits at the taxpayers’ expense. The Government as we see it now is a disgrace to this once Great Nation, the Founding Fathers and the people.

As we look back we can see what we got with the confirmation vote of Eric Holder, Hillary Clinton and Janet Napolitano, it is not a pretty sight. A vote to confirm John Kerry will be worse. Barrack Hussein Obama is well on his way to destroying this once Great Country and a vote to confirm the very people who will assist in this destruction is not to be taken lightly. It will set a record we will have to examine closely. As we have supported you since you first ran for the Senate any vote for Kerry would be a grave disappointment.

If anyone can point out where they think we are wrong we will gladly consider what they have to say. 

Those were our thoughts. But Senator Isakson's staff could not be bothered with them. 

Have a nice Day.