The Telegraph: How disgusting.

Like a “thief in the night” McClatchy Newspapers, The Telegraph’s parent company and The Telegraph have struck again.

They have tried to compare Mitt Romney with Barack Hussein Obama. We would assume they think they can pull this off because for the last four years they have given Barack Hussein Obama a walk while carrying his water.

On the other hand they have used every opportunity to denigrate the former Governor Mitt Romney. While this has been nothing like The Telegraph’s “hi-tech lynching of Herman Cain” for a while it seemed to be working with the former Governor. 

In their attempt to drag the former Governor down to Barack Hussein Obama’s level they used an article titled Obama, Romney differ little on security, foreign policy. It will not work.

We do not have an honest main stream media any more. As we have said they are for the most part like a “thief in the night”. They have completely turned their back on the roll the “Founding Fathers” envisioned for them.

When we look back we find that on Friday May 15, 2009 in response to a letter from Bill Paschal they expressed their contempt for the “First Amendment”. 

The editors of The Telegraph tell the reader that:

“The first amendment of the U.S. Constitution states that 'Congress shall make no law…abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press.’ The constitution does not address, directly or by implication, how to ‘report the news,’ with or with without bias. – Editors” 

The Telegraph use to run the “First Amendment” on their mast head, then for some reason they dropped it. In a “here today gone tomorrow” with no explanation it disappeared. On March 5^th, 2009 there it was, on March 6^th 2009 it was gone, swapped out for jokes by Letterman. Perhaps their hypocrisy was becoming too obvious.

Therefore it should come as no surprise when they try to drag former Governor Mitt Romney down to Barack Hussein Obama’s level. If The Telegraph had been honest for the last four years in their coverage of Obama the contrast would have been blinding, but because of this their readers have no way to compare the two individuals.

Two of the most glaring things that exposes The Telegraph for what they really are become indisputable when they are examined.

In The Telegraph’s “Presidential endorsement” on October 26, 2008 their first paragraph tells us that; 

“When historians explore the 2008 presidential election at some future time after the glow of the moment has worn dim, they will find several history-making moments.”

They are absolutely right and one of the first things they will find is how disingenuous and dishonest the news media has been to include The Telegraph.

As we all know Barack Hussein Obama was elected to the Office of President of the United States. 

Obama then appointed Eric Holder as Attorney General of the U. S. Holder was the first Black American to hold the position of Attorney General of the U.S. this was a historical event, one of those “…history-making moments.” The Telegraph referred to in their endorsement.

Due to Holders dishonesty and incompetence involving “gunrunning”, “fast and furious” and other things which resulted in some of the weapons being connected to the death of two federal agents  and hundreds of Mexican Nationals, Attorney General Eric Holder was cited for “Contempt of Congress”, another one of those “…history-making moments.”

To protect the first Black Attorney General the first Black President of the United States declared “Executive Privledge”. This was another one of those “…history-making moments.”

The Telegraph reported none of this. In fact they declared it “all politics” and used that as the reason for not reporting these “…history-making moments.”  

Then 56 days prior to the upcoming presidential election there was the beginning of another one of these “…history-making moments” which The Telegraph has not reported.

We are talking about the act of war on September 11 against the United States and the death of an Ambassador, two former Navy Seals and a Foreign Service Tech. Everyone who has followed this knows it did not interfere with Obama’s reelection campaign. The next day he was off to a fund raiser. This is serious and in the Armed Forces would have great consequences.

There has been nothing but deceit and lies by the Obama Administration in an effort to cover up the dereliction of duty by this administration. The Telegraph has ignored it. 

The Obama Administration made an attempt to link this to what they called a spontaneous act of a mob as a result of some film which no one had ever heard of. 

It did not work. It was evident to the entire world when the news got out that it was an organized terrorist attack. This was after Obama telling the world that Al-Qaeda is on its heels.

In response to a letter from Charlie McCutchen of Macon, Georgia questioning their cover up the editors responded that:

“Since the attack on the U.S. Consulate in Libya on Sept. 11, The Telegraph has published more than 25 stories regarding the issue either in print or on our website.”

As for The Telegraph’s assertion by the editors that they “…published more than 25 stories regarding the issue either in print…” or on their website.  - we can say this.

We do not know about the website but we can speak to the print. The stories were long on cover up and short on useful information. From Sept. 11^th to October 26^th there were 22 stories in print, of these 7 were in the “In Brief” section and contained a total of 1074 words which amounts to about one story. There were some 50 reference to the film, the video or the move and each one of these were linked to the death of the U.S. Ambassador and the three Americans. 

Reasonable people can say The Telegraph’s “stories” were more cover up than news.

The Telegraph did not address “the issue”. The issue is Obama’s attempt to cover up an act of war against the United States and the murder of a U.S. Ambassador, two former Navy Seals and a Foreign Service Tech.  

What The Telegraph did is repeat the cover up Obama was peddling much as they did when rendering aid to Bill Clinton. There is a link to everything The Telegraph published at The Telegraph’s cover up of Benghazi.

The Telegraph's aid to the Clintons can be see at; The sordid saga of The Telegraph and Bill Clinton! 

With The Telegraph’s history of dining off of the taxpayer’s dime and pedaling influence for employment this should not come as a surprise to no one.

Reasonable people can conclude that this is the most appalling and serious breach of trust by a President of the United States in the History of this Great Nation. If we look back to Richard Nixon and Watergate we have to remember no one was murdered. That was only a break in and a cover up.

Obama made an attempt to cover up an act of war and murder while The Telegraph has done their best to help. We find this disgusting.

We are not implying anything here but it does remind us of what The Telegraph says about “lawmakers” who do this sort of thing. 

The Telegraph tells us that;

 “However, it sort of makes the lawmakers who changed their votes look a little slimy, because everyone knows why they did it. They were like two-bit whores who bellied up to the taxpayers’ bar and declared, ‘I need to bring home the bacon. My no vote will turn into a yes vote once my palms get greasy with pork fat.’”

We might also note The Telegraph had no trouble with and did not report any of the lies and back door deals which cost the taxpayers’ hundreds of millions of dollars to pass Obamacare.

Links to the numerous stories about this can be found at: Obama’s Promises On Transparency And Ethics Leave Much To Be Desired 

And of course there is the description of the Bibb County School Superintendent Dr. Dallemand by a very astute lady who called in and talked to The Telegraph’s “News Talk Central”.

Perhaps she did not go far enough and maybe this description applies to The Telegraph also.

Have a nice day.