What does The Telegraph get for the cover up - A free lunch?

The Telegraph has slithered back into their cesspool in an attempt to dodge the criminal actions and cover up of the consulate in Benghazi attack by the Obama Administration.  

We can say this with a clear consciences as we look back to the month of October in the year of our Lord 2008. We see where The Telegraph slithered out of the cesspool long enough to slam the Bush Administration about “Another chapter in a tawdry affair”.  

The Telegraph tells us about:

 “…Attorney General Michael Mukasey’s naming a special prosecutor to look into whether or not former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, members of the Bush White House and a number of congressional Republicans should face criminal charges stemming from the firing of nine U.S. attorneys in 2006.”

The Telegraph referred to a report which “… didn't cite specific criminal collusion but urged that a special prosecutor determine if criminal violations occurred.” We find The Telegraph speculating about “…those who might be accused of criminal acts.” And additional their “…hope Mr. Bush will not consider pardons before he leaves office…” because that would as they put it “…erase any remaining doubt about his administration’s sorry role in this tawdry affair.”

When we look back we find that no one was charged with any wrong doing, it involved no deaths of Federal Agents; no death of foreign nationals with guns furnished by the Obama Administration and no “Contempt of Congress.”

All of the above has occurred with Attorney General Eric Holder and the Obama Administration. As can be seen in the following video The Telegraph has decided it is “all politics” and not worthy  of coverage. 

 This did not stop The Telegraph. Every chance they got they twisted things to do their best to denigrate the Bush Administration, Attorney General Gonzales and the U.S. Justice Department.  They completely ignored any semblance of journalistic integrity in the pursuit of their goal.

When all was said and done no one was found guilty of anything. “a career Justice Department prosecutor not beholden to any administration shows us that the witch hunt against Albert Gonzales was a politically motivated sham.”^[67]  

Yet The Telegraph hammered away at it. More can be seen at; “Some of Sherrie Marshall's Best Efforts!” The Three stories shown at this link are only an example there was much more.  Like an addict they could not quit. After it was all over they did not bother with a correction. But then you cannot scam people with the “Big Lie” by being honest. 

This was clearly demonstrated by The Telegraph in their: The Telegraph's "hi-tech" lynching of Herman Cain!

This brings to mind one of The Telegraph Editorial Page Editor Charles E. Richardson’s tirades about “lawmakers”.  He tells us that:

“However, it sort of makes the lawmakers who changed their votes look a little slimy, because everyone knows why they did it. They were like two-bit whores who bellied up to the taxpayers’ bar and declared, ‘I need to bring home the bacon.'”

If we change the word “lawmakers” to "The Telegraph" and the word “votes” to "facts" we have a fairly close rendition of The Telegraph.

Back in October of 2008 we are told by The Telegraph that: 

“President George Bush has no influence for a number of reasons, not the least of which is the Iraq war, Katrina and various other scandals that have plagued his administration. He can’t pull the nation together as he tried to do – and failed – with his address from the White House last week.” 

You can rest assured The Telegraph covered everyone of the so-called "scandals that plagued his administration." 

However if The Telegraph cannot minimize the "scandals" of the Obama Administration they ignore them or as we seen in the above video label them "all politics" and refuse to cover them.

When they do this and promote the paper as "middle Georgia's newspaper" to us this qualifies as a scam.

Richardson goes on with “I’m just amazed at what bought the lawmakers votes.” This is something Charles E. Richardson would be familiar with because as we all know by this time he has a penchant for “free lunches” and appears to be willing to “pedal influence for employment.”

We realize that President and Publisher George McCanless only refers to one “lousy lunch” but this is somewhat mystifying. Although there is a difference in degree the principle is the same. 

We have to ask do you know anyone who robbed only one seven-eleven store unless they got caught the first time.

During the influence pedaling a very gracious lady named Pat called in with a description of Dr. Dallemand, the Bibb County School Superintendent who provided the taxpayers money for the free lunches enjoyed by Richardson. Her description of Dr. Dallemand seemed very apt and might be applied to The Telegraph.

The Telegraph cannot be trusted. If they want to be the propaganda arm of the Obama Administration and the Democrat Party they should be honest with the people and quit promoting the paper as middle Georgia’s newspaper. At times they do remind us "of a thief in the night." 

Have a nice day.