The Telegraph's true colors.

For an individual who has what we feel is a history of advocating violence Richardson wrote a compelling column which was run in today’s paper. The column can be seen at; RICHARDSON: What if tables were turned?

If this had happened and as the heading says “…the tables were turned?” there would have been rioting in the streets of Macon, Georgia and that would have been all Catherine Meeks and The Telegraph would have written about for months.

The Telegraph clearly indicated their stance on this with the “Trayvon Martin and George Zimmerman” case as demonstrated by Richardson on The Telegraph’s “News Talk Central” aired in middle Georgia.

The following comment was posted to the column:

This is quite a compelling column from an individual who has proclaimed to the world that he has a God given right to kill his own children. Talking about his child he has told the world; “I brought him in here and I will take him out. Under my roof I am the boss, he is not and neither is DFACS and neither is anybody else. I’m the one that is responsible; God gave me that responsibility to run my house.” Of course “anybody” has to include both the officers of the law and judges who DFACS works with.

On another occasion Richardson tells the world that: “I’m in at least one school generally every week. They hear from their Teachers all the time then all of a sudden I walk [in] and my first words out of my mouth I do not work for the school system and if you are not quiet I will kill you.”We have to ask does this advocate the violence he is talking about in this column?

 More on this can be seen at; Does The Telegraph make their case?

Yes this is quite a column for a man who claims a God given right to kill his own children and goes into the public schools and tells the students that “…I will kill you.”

Of course the Editorial Board shows their bigotry like a blinding light in an editorial titled; Lies and damn lies win the day in the Senate to which the following comment was posted.

There is no better example of the hard core bigotry of The Telegraph’s Editorial Board than this “Opinion”.  Like a blinding light it illuminates the true nature of these individuals.

It clearly demonstrates just how low they will sink when the “lawmakers” acting as the people’s elected representives displease them.

Here The Telegraph labels the “lawmakers” as “cowards” who tell “…Lies and damn lies…”  and could clearly indicate Executive Editor Sherrie Marshall’s call “…for a little civility.” after the election of course was nothing more than a con. Nothing unusual about that.

Of course this is not the first time. In the past The Telegraph when displeased has labeled the “lawmakers” as “slimy” and “two-bit whores”.  

It looks as if The Telegraph thinks the Privledge to tell “lies and damn lies” is the sole purview of The Telegraph and wire services. 

They have clearly indicated this several times as can be seen in: 

“The Telegraph's "hi-tech" lynching of Herman Cain!” – “The Telegraph's con on "Fast and Furious" and “The Telegraph’s cover up of Benghazi.”

We ask does this make The Telegraph Editorial Board hypocrites?

Have a nice day.